2017-2020 Isuzu D-Max II (facelift ) 1.9 (164 Hp)

The Isuzu D-Max II, specifically the facelifted version introduced in 2017, represented a significant update to Isuzu’s popular mid-size pickup truck. This iteration of the D-Max, sold from 2017 to 2020, was primarily aimed at the global market, with strong sales in Australia, Europe, and Asia. The 1.9-liter turbocharged diesel engine, producing 164 horsepower, was a key component of this update, offering a balance of fuel efficiency and capability. This variant typically occupied a mid-range position within the D-Max lineup, appealing to buyers seeking a practical and reliable workhorse without the premium price tag of higher-spec models.

Technical Specifications

Brand Isuzu
Model D-Max
Generation D-Max II (facelift 2017)
Type (Engine) 1.9 (164 Hp)
Start of production 2017
End of production 2020
Powertrain Architecture Internal Combustion engine
Body type Pick-up
Seats 5
Doors 4
Fuel consumption (urban) 7.6 l/100 km (30.9 US mpg)
Fuel consumption (extra urban) 6.6 l/100 km (35.6 US mpg)
Fuel consumption (combined) 7 l/100 km (33.6 US mpg)
CO2 emissions 183 g/km
Fuel Type Diesel
Acceleration 0 – 100 km/h 12.7 sec
Acceleration 0 – 62 mph 12.7 sec
Acceleration 0 – 60 mph 12.1 sec
Maximum speed 180 km/h (111.85 mph)
Emission standard Euro 6
Weight-to-power ratio 11.9 kg/Hp
Weight-to-torque ratio 5.4 kg/Nm
Power 164 Hp @ 3600 rpm
Torque 360 Nm @ 2000-2500 rpm (265.52 lb.-ft.)
Engine Model/Code RZ4E-TC
Engine displacement 1898 cm3 (115.82 cu. in.)
Number of cylinders 4
Engine configuration Inline
Cylinder Bore 80 mm (3.15 in.)
Piston Stroke 94.4 mm (3.72 in.)
Compression ratio 15.9:1
Number of valves per cylinder 2
Fuel injection system Diesel Commonrail
Engine aspiration Turbocharger, Intercooler
Engine oil capacity 6.6 l (6.97 US qt | 5.81 UK qt)
Kerb Weight 1954 kg (4307.83 lbs.)
Max. weight 3050 kg (6724.1 lbs.)
Max load 1096 kg (2416.27 lbs.)
Fuel tank capacity 76 l (20.08 US gal | 16.72 UK gal)
Permitted trailer load with brakes (12%) 3500 kg (7716.18 lbs.)
Permitted trailer load without brakes 750 kg (1653.47 lbs.)
Permitted towbar download 245 kg (540.13 lbs.)
Length 5295 mm (208.46 in.)
Width 1860 mm (73.23 in.)
Height 1795-1870 mm (70.67 – 73.62 in.)
Wheelbase 3095 mm (121.85 in.)
Front track 1570 mm (61.81 in.)
Rear track 1570 mm (61.81 in.)
Ride height (ground clearance) 235 mm (9.25 in.)
Approach angle 30°
Departure angle 23°
Ramp-over angle 22°
Drive wheel All wheel drive (4×4)
Number of gears and type of gearbox 6 gears, manual transmission
Front brakes Ventilated discs
Rear brakes Drum
Assisting systems ABS (Anti-lock braking system)
Tires size 255/60 R18
Wheel rims size 7.0J x 18

Powertrain & Engine Architecture

The heart of this D-Max variant is the RZ4E-TC 1.9-liter inline-four cylinder diesel engine. This engine represented a move towards downsizing and improved efficiency compared to the previous 2.5-liter engine offered in earlier D-Max models. The RZ4E-TC utilizes a cast iron block and aluminum cylinder head, a common configuration for durability and weight reduction. It features a single turbocharger with an intercooler to enhance power and torque output. The fuel injection system is a common rail direct injection system, allowing for precise fuel delivery and optimized combustion. The engine produces 164 horsepower at 3600 rpm and 360 Nm (265.52 lb-ft) of torque between 2000 and 2500 rpm. The six-speed manual transmission was the standard offering for this configuration, providing a good balance between fuel economy and driver control. While an automatic transmission was available in some markets, it wasn’t as commonly paired with this specific engine.

Driving Characteristics

The 1.9-liter engine, paired with the six-speed manual transmission, provided a reasonably responsive driving experience. While not exceptionally quick – 0-60 mph took around 12.1 seconds – it offered sufficient power for everyday driving and hauling moderate loads. The torque curve was relatively flat, providing good pulling power from low engine speeds, which was particularly useful for off-road driving and towing. Compared to the more powerful 2.5-liter engine, the 1.9-liter felt less strained at higher speeds, but also lacked the outright acceleration of its larger counterpart. The manual transmission offered precise shifts, and the gear ratios were well-suited to both on-road and off-road conditions. The overall driving experience was characterized by practicality and dependability rather than sporty performance.

Equipment & Trim Levels

The 1.9-liter D-Max typically came equipped with a respectable level of standard features. These generally included air conditioning, power windows, central locking, and a basic audio system with USB connectivity. Higher trim levels added features such as alloy wheels, a touchscreen infotainment system, rear parking sensors, and a reversing camera. Interior upholstery was typically cloth, with durable plastic trim throughout the cabin. Optional extras included a navigation system, leather upholstery, and a more advanced audio system. Safety features such as ABS brakes and multiple airbags were standard across the range.

Chassis & Braking

The D-Max II utilized a body-on-frame construction, providing a robust and durable platform for demanding applications. The suspension consisted of independent double wishbones at the front and leaf springs at the rear. This setup provided a comfortable ride quality, even when carrying a load. The braking system featured ventilated discs at the front and drum brakes at the rear. ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) was standard, enhancing safety during emergency braking situations. The chassis was designed to handle a substantial payload, with a maximum load capacity of around 1096 kg (2416.27 lbs).

Market Reception & Comparison

The 1.9-liter D-Max was generally well-received by critics as a practical and fuel-efficient workhorse. It offered a good balance between performance, economy, and reliability. Compared to other mid-size pickups in its class, such as the Toyota Hilux and Ford Ranger, the D-Max often stood out for its value for money and robust build quality. However, some reviewers noted that the 1.9-liter engine lacked the refinement and power of some of its competitors. Fuel economy was a strong point, with combined fuel consumption figures around 7 l/100 km (33.6 US mpg). Reliability was also a key strength, with the Isuzu diesel engine having a reputation for longevity.

Legacy

The RZ4E-TC 1.9-liter engine has proven to be a relatively reliable powertrain. While some early models experienced minor issues with the diesel particulate filter (DPF), these were generally addressed through software updates. On the used car market, the 1.9-liter D-Max represents a good value proposition for buyers seeking a dependable and affordable pickup truck. Its fuel efficiency and robust construction make it a practical choice for both work and leisure. The availability of spare parts is generally good, and maintenance costs are relatively reasonable. The D-Max II, particularly the 1.9-liter variant, has cemented Isuzu’s reputation as a manufacturer of tough and reliable pickup trucks.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top