The Kia Optima III, specifically the facelifted version released in 2013, represented a significant step forward for the Korean automaker in the mid-size sedan segment. This generation, built on the TF platform (internally designated as the ‘HF’ platform), aimed to offer a more sophisticated and stylish alternative to established competitors like the Toyota Camry and Honda Accord. The 2.0 CVVT 16V (165 Hp) Automatic variant, produced from 2013 to 2015, served as a core offering within the Optima lineup, positioned as a balance between affordability, fuel efficiency, and acceptable performance. It was designed to appeal to a broad range of buyers seeking a comfortable and well-equipped family sedan.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Kia |
| Model | Optima |
| Generation | Optima III (facelift 2013) |
| Type (Engine) | 2.0 CVVT 16V (165 Hp) Automatic |
| Start of production | 2013 |
| End of production | 2015 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Sedan |
| Seats | 5 |
| Doors | 4 |
| Fuel consumption (urban) | 10.3 l/100 km (22.8 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (extra urban) | 6.1 l/100 km (38.6 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (combined) | 7.6 l/100 km (30.9 US mpg) |
| CO2 emissions | 177 g/km |
| Fuel Type | Petrol (Gasoline) |
| Acceleration 0 – 100 km/h | 10.6 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 62 mph | 10.6 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 60 mph | 10.1 sec |
| Maximum speed | 208 km/h (129.25 mph) |
| Emission standard | Euro 5 |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 8.8 kg/Hp |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 7.4 kg/Nm |
| Power | 165 Hp @ 6500 rpm |
| Torque | 196 Nm @ 4800 rpm (144.56 lb.-ft. @ 4800 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Transverse |
| Engine Model/Code | Nu / G4NA |
| Engine displacement | 1999 cm3 (121.99 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 4 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 81 mm (3.19 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 97 mm (3.82 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 10.5:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Multi-port manifold injection |
| Engine aspiration | Naturally aspirated engine |
| Valvetrain | DOHC |
| Engine oil capacity | 4.3 l (4.54 US qt | 3.78 UK qt) |
| Coolant capacity | 6.5 l (6.87 US qt | 5.72 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 1450 kg (3196.7 lbs.) |
| Max. weight | 2000 kg (4409.25 lbs.) |
| Max load | 550 kg (1212.54 lbs.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – minimum | 505 l (17.83 cu. ft.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 70 l (18.49 US gal | 15.4 UK gal) |
| Permitted trailer load with brakes (12%) | 1300 kg (2866.01 lbs.) |
| Permitted trailer load without brakes | 650 kg (1433 lbs.) |
| Permitted towbar download | 60 kg (132.28 lbs.) |
| Length | 4845 mm (190.75 in.) |
| Width | 1830 mm (72.05 in.) |
| Height | 1455 mm (57.28 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 2795 mm (110.04 in.) |
| Front track | 1601 mm (63.03 in.) |
| Rear track | 1601 mm (63.03 in.) |
| Front overhang | 965 mm (37.99 in.) |
| Rear overhang | 1085 mm (42.72 in.) |
| Minimum turning circle | 11.2 m (36.75 ft.) |
| Drivetrain Architecture | Front wheel drive |
| Drive wheel | Front wheel drive |
| Number of gears and type of gearbox | 6 gears, automatic transmission |
| Front suspension | Independent, type McPherson with coil spring and anti-roll bar |
| Rear suspension | Independent multi-link suspension |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs |
| Rear brakes | Disc |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Tires size | 215/55 R17 |
| Wheel rims size | 6.5J x 17 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
At the heart of this Optima variant lies the Kia Nu engine family, specifically the G4NA 2.0-liter inline-four cylinder gasoline engine. This engine utilizes a double overhead camshaft (DOHC) valvetrain with four valves per cylinder, and Kia’s Continuously Variable Valve Timing (CVVT) technology. CVVT optimizes valve timing based on engine speed and load, improving both performance and fuel efficiency. The engine employs multi-point fuel injection, delivering fuel directly to the intake ports. The 1999cc displacement is achieved with a bore of 81mm and a stroke of 97mm, operating at a compression ratio of 10.5:1. Paired with this engine is a six-speed automatic transmission, chosen for its smooth operation and ease of use, catering to the typical buyer in this segment. This transmission was a conventional torque-converter automatic, prioritizing comfort over outright sportiness.
Driving Characteristics
The 165 horsepower and 196 Nm (144.56 lb-ft) of torque produced by this combination resulted in adequate, but not exhilarating, performance. Acceleration from 0 to 60 mph took around 10.1 seconds, making it competitive with other mainstream mid-size sedans of the era. The automatic transmission, while smooth, was tuned for fuel economy and comfort, meaning gear changes were often subtle and not particularly quick. Compared to the available turbocharged 2.0-liter engine option in the Optima, or even the later 2.4-liter naturally aspirated engine, this variant felt noticeably less powerful. However, it offered a more relaxed driving experience, particularly in city traffic. The gear ratios were optimized for cruising, providing decent highway performance, but lacked the responsiveness desired by more enthusiastic drivers.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The 2.0 CVVT Automatic trim typically included standard features such as air conditioning, power windows and locks, a basic audio system with USB connectivity, and standard safety equipment like ABS, airbags, and stability control. Higher trim levels, such as the Limited, added features like leather upholstery, a sunroof, upgraded audio systems, and advanced safety technologies. The interior generally featured a straightforward dashboard layout with durable materials. Optional extras included navigation systems, heated seats, and a rear-view camera.
Chassis & Braking
The Optima III utilized a front-wheel-drive layout with an independent McPherson strut suspension in the front and an independent multi-link suspension in the rear. This suspension setup provided a comfortable ride quality, absorbing bumps and imperfections in the road effectively. Braking duties were handled by ventilated discs in the front and solid discs in the rear. ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) was standard, enhancing safety during emergency braking situations. The chassis was tuned for comfort and stability, rather than sporty handling.
Market Reception & Comparison
The 2.0 CVVT Automatic Optima was generally well-received by critics as a solid, value-oriented mid-size sedan. It offered a good balance of features, fuel economy, and price. However, it was often criticized for its lack of outright performance compared to some of its competitors. Fuel economy figures of around 30.9 US mpg combined were respectable for the time, but not class-leading. Reliability proved to be generally good, with few major issues reported with the engine or transmission. Compared to the more powerful turbocharged Optima variants, this version appealed to buyers prioritizing affordability and fuel efficiency over performance.
Legacy
The Kia Optima III, and specifically the 2.0 CVVT Automatic variant, played a crucial role in establishing Kia as a serious contender in the mid-size sedan market. The powertrain, while not particularly groundbreaking, proved to be durable and reliable. Today, used examples of this Optima are readily available and generally represent a good value for buyers seeking an affordable and practical family car. While maintenance costs are relatively low, potential buyers should be aware of the typical wear and tear associated with any vehicle of this age, such as suspension components and potential oil leaks. The G4NA engine is known for its longevity when properly maintained, making it a reasonably dependable choice in the used car market.
