2010-2015 Ford C-MAX II 1.6 Ti-VCT (85 Hp)

The Ford C-MAX II 1.6 Ti-VCT (85 hp) was a compact multi-purpose vehicle (MPV) produced by Ford between 2010 and 2015. Positioned as an entry-level offering within the second generation C-MAX range, it aimed to provide affordable family transport with a focus on fuel efficiency. This variant played a significant role in Ford’s European lineup, offering a practical and economical alternative to larger MPVs and small SUVs. While not sold in the US market, the C-MAX II was a popular choice for families in Europe seeking a versatile and space-efficient vehicle.

Technical Specifications

Brand Ford
Model C-MAX
Generation C-MAX II
Type (Engine) 1.6 Ti-VCT (85 Hp)
Start of production 2010
End of production 2015
Powertrain Architecture Internal Combustion engine
Body type MPV
Seats 5
Doors 5
Fuel consumption (urban) 8.4 l/100 km (28 US mpg, 33.6 UK mpg, 11.9 km/l)
Fuel consumption (extra urban) 5.2 l/100 km (45.2 US mpg, 54.3 UK mpg, 19.2 km/l)
Fuel consumption (combined) 6.4 l/100 km (36.8 US mpg, 44.1 UK mpg, 15.6 km/l)
CO2 emissions 149 g/km
Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
Acceleration 0 – 100 km/h 15.9 sec
Acceleration 0 – 62 mph 15.9 sec
Acceleration 0 – 60 mph 15.1 sec
Maximum speed 165 km/h (102.53 mph)
Emission standard Euro 5
Weight-to-power ratio 15.3 kg/Hp, 65.4 Hp/tonne
Weight-to-torque ratio 9.2 kg/Nm, 108.5 Nm/tonne
Power 85 Hp @ 6000 rpm
Power per litre 53.3 Hp/l
Torque 141 Nm @ 2500 rpm (104 lb.-ft. @ 2500 rpm)
Engine layout Front, Transverse
Engine Model/Code XTDB
Engine displacement 1596 cm3 (97.39 cu. in.)
Number of cylinders 4
Engine configuration Inline
Cylinder Bore 79 mm (3.11 in.)
Piston Stroke 81.4 mm (3.2 in.)
Compression ratio 11:1
Number of valves per cylinder 4
Fuel injection system Multi-port manifold injection
Engine aspiration Naturally aspirated engine
Valvetrain DOHC
Engine oil capacity 4.1 l (4.33 US qt | 3.61 UK qt)
Coolant 5.5 l (5.81 US qt | 4.84 UK qt)
Kerb Weight 1299 kg (2863.8 lbs.)
Max. weight 1860 kg (4100.6 lbs.)
Max load 561 kg (1236.79 lbs.)
Trunk (boot) space – minimum 432 l (15.26 cu. ft.)
Trunk (boot) space – maximum 1723 l (60.85 cu. ft.)
Fuel tank capacity 55 l (14.53 US gal | 12.1 UK gal)
Permitted trailer load with brakes (12%) 800 kg (1763.7 lbs.)
Permitted trailer load without brakes 685 kg (1510.17 lbs.)
Length 4380 mm (172.44 in.)
Width 1828 mm (71.97 in.)
Width with mirrors folded 1858 mm (73.15 in.)
Width including mirrors 2067 mm (81.38 in.)
Height 1626 mm (64.02 in.)
Wheelbase 2648 mm (104.25 in.)
Front track 1544 mm (60.79 in.)
Rear (Back) track 1554 mm (61.18 in.)
Minimum turning circle 10.7 m (35.1 ft.)
Drivetrain Architecture The Internal combustion engine (ICE) drives the front wheels of the vehicle.
Drive wheel Front wheel drive
Number of gears and type of gearbox 5 gears, manual transmission
Front suspension Independent, type McPherson with coil spring and anti-roll bar
Rear suspension Independent multi-link spring suspension with stabilizer
Front brakes Ventilated discs
Rear brakes Disc
Assisting systems ABS (Anti-lock braking system)
Steering type Steering rack and pinion
Power steering Electric Steering
Tires size 205/55 R16
Wheel rims size 6.5 J x 16

INTRODUCTION

The Ford C-MAX II, launched in 2010, represented Ford’s second attempt at a compact MPV, building upon the success of the original C-MAX. The 1.6 Ti-VCT 85 hp variant served as the entry point to the range, targeting budget-conscious buyers and those prioritizing fuel economy. It was built on the Ford C-platform (also known as the 1HX0/A3 platform), shared with models like the Ford Focus. This platform allowed for a relatively lightweight and efficient vehicle, contributing to its fuel-saving characteristics. The C-MAX II aimed to compete with vehicles like the Opel/Vauxhall Meriva, Renault Scenic, and Volkswagen Touran, offering a more affordable and practical alternative to larger, more expensive MPVs.

Powertrain & Engine Architecture

The heart of the C-MAX II 1.6 Ti-VCT was the XTDB engine, a 1.6-liter inline-four cylinder petrol engine. This engine utilized a Ti-VCT (Twin Independent Variable Camshaft Timing) system, which optimized valve timing for improved performance and fuel efficiency across the rev range. The engine employed multi-point fuel injection, delivering fuel directly into the intake ports. The 85 hp output was achieved at 6000 rpm, with a torque figure of 141 Nm (104 lb-ft) available at 2500 rpm. The engine featured a compression ratio of 11:1. The engine was paired with a five-speed manual transmission, chosen for its simplicity and contribution to fuel economy. While an automatic transmission was offered on other C-MAX variants, it wasn’t available with the 85 hp engine.

Driving Characteristics

The 1.6 Ti-VCT 85 hp engine provided adequate, but not exhilarating, performance. Acceleration from 0-60 mph took around 15.1 seconds, and top speed was limited to 165 km/h (102.53 mph). The engine felt somewhat strained when fully loaded or tackling steep inclines. The five-speed manual transmission was well-matched to the engine’s characteristics, offering a reasonable spread of gears. Gear ratios were optimized for fuel efficiency rather than outright performance. Compared to the more powerful 1.6 EcoBoost or 1.8-liter petrol variants, the 85 hp engine lacked the punch for quick overtaking maneuvers. However, it offered a smoother and more predictable driving experience, particularly in urban environments. The manual transmission also gave the driver more control over engine speed and torque delivery.

Equipment & Trim Levels

The 1.6 Ti-VCT 85 hp C-MAX typically came with a relatively basic level of equipment, reflecting its position as the entry-level model. Standard features generally included air conditioning, power steering, electric front windows, and a basic audio system with CD player. Safety features such as ABS, front airbags, and seatbelt pretensioners were also standard. Higher trim levels, such as Zetec, offered additional features like alloy wheels, upgraded audio systems, cruise control, and rear electric windows. Optional extras included parking sensors, a panoramic sunroof, and leather upholstery. Interior upholstery was typically cloth, with a functional and durable design. The dashboard layout was straightforward and user-friendly.

Chassis & Braking

The C-MAX II utilized an independent front suspension with McPherson struts and a coil spring, coupled with an independent multi-link rear suspension. This setup provided a comfortable ride quality and decent handling characteristics. The front brakes were ventilated discs, while the rear brakes were solid discs. The suspension was tuned for comfort rather than sporty handling, prioritizing ride quality over sharp cornering. The steering was electrically assisted, providing light and easy steering feel. The C-MAX II’s weight of approximately 1299 kg (2863.8 lbs) contributed to its relatively modest performance, but also helped to maintain reasonable fuel economy.

Market Reception & Comparison

The Ford C-MAX II 1.6 Ti-VCT 85 hp received mixed reviews. Critics praised its fuel efficiency and practicality, but noted its lack of outright performance. It was generally considered a sensible and economical choice for families, but those seeking a more engaging driving experience were advised to consider the higher-powered variants. Compared to the 1.6 EcoBoost engine, the 1.6 Ti-VCT offered lower running costs but significantly less power. The 1.6 EcoBoost provided a more refined and responsive driving experience, but at a higher price point. The 1.6 Ti-VCT’s fuel economy of around 36.8 US mpg combined was competitive within its class.

Legacy

The Ford C-MAX II 1.6 Ti-VCT 85 hp has proven to be a relatively reliable vehicle, with the 1.6 Ti-VCT engine generally considered durable. Common issues are typically related to wear and tear on components such as the clutch, suspension bushings, and exhaust system. On the used car market, these models are often sought after by buyers looking for an affordable and practical MPV. While not a performance standout, the C-MAX II 1.6 Ti-VCT remains a viable option for those prioritizing fuel economy, practicality, and low running costs. Its simple engine design and readily available parts contribute to its continued appeal in the used car market.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top