The Chevrolet Metro Sedan (MR226) 1.3 LSi, produced from 1998 to 2007, represented a significant offering in the subcompact car segment, particularly within the North American market. Derived from the Suzuki Cultus, the Metro was a joint venture product, reflecting a strategic partnership between General Motors and Suzuki. The 1.3 LSi trim, powered by a 79 horsepower engine and typically paired with a 5-speed manual transmission (though an automatic was available), served as a mid-range option within the Metro lineup, positioned above the base models and below any potential special editions. It aimed to provide affordable transportation with reasonable fuel efficiency and a degree of practicality for small families or commuters.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Chevrolet |
| Model | Metro |
| Generation | Metro Sedan (MR226) |
| Type (Engine) | 1.3 LSi (79 Hp) |
| Start of production | 1998 |
| End of production | 2007 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Sedan |
| Seats | 4 |
| Doors | 4 |
| Fuel consumption (urban) | 6.1 l/100 km (38.6 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (extra urban) | 5.5 l/100 km (42.8 US mpg) |
| Fuel Type | Petrol (Gasoline) |
| Maximum speed | 165 km/h (102.53 mph) |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 11.4 kg/Hp |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 8.8 kg/Nm |
| Power | 79 Hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Power per litre | 60.8 Hp/l |
| Torque | 102 Nm @ 3000 rpm (75.23 lb.-ft. @ 3000 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Transverse |
| Engine displacement | 1299 cm3 (79.27 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 4 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 74 mm (2.91 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 75.5 mm (2.97 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 9.5:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 2 |
| Fuel injection system | Multi-port manifold injection |
| Engine aspiration | Naturally aspirated |
| Valvetrain | OHC |
| Engine oil capacity | 3.3 l (3.49 US qt | 2.9 UK qt) |
| Coolant capacity | 4 l (4.23 US qt | 3.52 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 900 kg (1984.16 lbs.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – minimum | 240 l (8.48 cu. ft.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – maximum | 635 l (22.42 cu. ft.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 39 l (10.3 US gal | 8.58 UK gal) |
| Length | 4170 mm (164.17 in.) |
| Width | 1590 mm (62.6 in.) |
| Height | 1410 mm (55.51 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 2360 mm (92.91 in.) |
| Front track | 1380 mm (54.33 in.) |
| Rear track | 1360 mm (53.54 in.) |
| Drivetrain Architecture | Front wheel drive |
| Number of gears | 5 |
| Type of gearbox | Manual transmission |
| Front suspension | Coil spring |
| Rear suspension | Coil spring |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs |
| Rear brakes | Drum |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Power steering | Hydraulic |
| Tires size | 155/80 R13 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of the 1.3 LSi Metro was the G13BB inline-four cylinder engine. This 1.3-liter (1299 cc) engine featured a single overhead camshaft (SOHC) valvetrain with two valves per cylinder. It utilized a multi-port fuel injection system, a common setup for its time, providing a balance between fuel efficiency and performance. The engine produced 79 horsepower at 6000 rpm and 102 Nm (75.23 lb-ft) of torque at 3000 rpm. The engine’s design prioritized reliability and low maintenance costs over outright power. The standard transmission was a 5-speed manual, but a 3-speed automatic transmission was also offered, albeit at the expense of some performance and fuel economy. The automatic transmission was a Jatco unit, known for its durability but relatively simple design.
Driving Characteristics
The 1.3 LSi Metro with the 5-speed manual offered adequate, though not exhilarating, performance. Acceleration was modest, with a focus on fuel efficiency rather than quick sprints. The manual transmission allowed drivers to keep the engine in its optimal power band, making it feel more responsive. The automatic transmission, while convenient, noticeably dulled acceleration. Gear ratios were geared towards economy, with taller gearing in higher gears to maximize fuel mileage on the highway. Handling was predictable and safe, but not particularly sporty. The suspension was tuned for comfort, absorbing bumps reasonably well, but body roll was noticeable in corners. Compared to higher-trim models (if any were offered in certain markets) or those with larger engines, the 1.3 LSi felt underpowered, especially when fully loaded with passengers and cargo.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The 1.3 LSi trim offered a step up in features compared to the base Metro models. Standard equipment typically included air conditioning, power steering, and an AM/FM radio. Interior upholstery was usually cloth, with a relatively simple dashboard layout. Optional extras could include upgraded audio systems, power windows, and power door locks. The LSi trim generally featured slightly more refined interior materials and trim pieces compared to the base models. Safety features were basic for the era, typically including seatbelts and an anti-lock braking system (ABS) as standard equipment.
Chassis & Braking
The Metro Sedan utilized a front-wheel-drive layout with a relatively simple chassis design. The front suspension consisted of coil springs and a stabilizer bar, while the rear suspension employed coil springs. Braking duties were handled by ventilated discs at the front and drum brakes at the rear. The braking system, while adequate for the vehicle’s weight and performance, lacked the stopping power of more modern systems. The relatively lightweight construction of the Metro helped to offset the limitations of the braking system.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Chevrolet Metro, and specifically the 1.3 LSi variant, was generally well-received as an affordable and fuel-efficient option in the subcompact car segment. Critics praised its low price, good gas mileage, and ease of maintenance. However, it was often criticized for its lack of power, basic interior, and somewhat unrefined driving experience. Compared to other subcompacts of the time, such as the Honda Civic or Toyota Corolla, the Metro offered a lower price point but lacked the same level of refinement and performance. The automatic transmission version of the 1.3 LSi was often seen as a compromise, sacrificing performance for convenience.
Legacy
The Chevrolet Metro, while not a particularly groundbreaking vehicle, served as a reliable and affordable transportation option for many drivers. The G13BB engine proved to be durable and relatively trouble-free, contributing to the Metro’s reputation for reliability. In the used car market, Metros are often sought after by those looking for a cheap and economical vehicle for commuting or as a first car. While parts availability may be becoming more challenging as the vehicle ages, the simplicity of the design makes it relatively easy to repair and maintain. The Metro’s legacy lies in its affordability and practicality, providing basic transportation without breaking the bank.
