The Chevrolet Tracker II 2.5i V6 24V (167 hp) was a compact sport utility vehicle (SUV) produced by Chevrolet from 2001 to 2004. Positioned as a slightly more upscale offering within the Tracker II range, this variant featured a V6 engine and a five-speed manual transmission, differentiating it from the base four-cylinder models and the available automatic transmission options. It represented Chevrolet’s entry into the growing small SUV segment, offering a blend of affordability, practicality, and a more spirited driving experience than its competitors. The Tracker II, internally designated as the GM V platform, was a re-engineered version of the original Tracker, aiming to improve refinement and performance.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Chevrolet |
| Model | Tracker |
| Generation | Tracker II |
| Type (Engine) | 2.5 i V6 24V (167 Hp) |
| Start of production | 2001 |
| End of production | 2004 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | SUV |
| Seats | 5 |
| Doors | 5 |
| Fuel consumption (urban) | 12.4 l/100 km (19 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (extra urban) | 11.2 l/100 km (21 US mpg) |
| Fuel Type | Petrol (Gasoline) |
| Maximum speed | 160 km/h (99.42 mph) |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 8 kg/Hp |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 6.1 kg/Nm |
| Power | 167 Hp @ 6500 rpm |
| Power per litre | 67 Hp/l |
| Torque | 220 Nm @ 4000 rpm (162.26 lb.-ft. @ 4000 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Longitudinal |
| Engine Model/Code | H25A |
| Engine displacement | 2494 cm3 (152.19 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 6 |
| Engine configuration | V-engine |
| Cylinder Bore | 84 mm (3.31 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 75 mm (2.95 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 9.5:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Multi-port manifold injection |
| Engine aspiration | Naturally aspirated engine |
| Valvetrain | OHC |
| Engine oil capacity | 5.5 l (5.81 US qt | 4.84 UK qt) |
| Coolant | 8 l (8.45 US qt | 7.04 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 1335 kg (2943.17 lbs.) |
| Max. weight | 1810 kg (3990.37 lbs.) |
| Max load | 475 kg (1047.2 lbs.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – minimum | 575 l (20.31 cu. ft.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – maximum | 1265 l (44.67 cu. ft.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 66 l (17.44 US gal | 14.52 UK gal) |
| Length | 4059 mm (159.8 in.) |
| Width | 1694 mm (66.69 in.) |
| Height | 1689 mm (66.5 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 2479 mm (97.6 in.) |
| Front track | 1460 mm (57.48 in.) |
| Rear (Back) track | 1460 mm (57.48 in.) |
| Drivetrain Architecture | The Internal combustion engine (ICE) drives the rear wheels of the vehicle. |
| Drive wheel | Rear wheel drive |
| Number of gears and type of gearbox | 5 gears, manual transmission |
| Front suspension | Spring Strut |
| Rear suspension | Coil spring |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs |
| Rear brakes | Drum |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Steering type | Worm-reduction unit |
| Power steering | Hydraulic Steering |
| Tires size | 215/70 R15 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of the Tracker II 2.5i V6 was the GM H25A engine, a 2.5-liter, 60-degree V6. This engine utilized a cast iron block with aluminum cylinder heads, a configuration common for GM’s mid-size offerings at the time. The H25A featured multi-port fuel injection and a single overhead camshaft (OHC) design per cylinder bank, operating with four valves per cylinder. This valvetrain setup contributed to the engine’s relatively smooth power delivery. The 167 horsepower output was a significant step up from the base 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine offered in other Tracker II models. The five-speed manual transmission provided a more engaging driving experience compared to the optional four-speed automatic, offering closer gear ratios and better control. The transmission was rear-wheel drive, a somewhat unusual configuration for a compact SUV in the American market, but common for the Suzuki Escudo/Vitara platform upon which the Tracker was based.
Driving Characteristics
The 2.5i V6 with the manual transmission offered a noticeable improvement in performance over the base engine. Acceleration was brisk for a vehicle of its size, and the engine provided ample torque for everyday driving and occasional highway passing maneuvers. The manual gearbox allowed drivers to fully utilize the engine’s powerband, while the rear-wheel-drive layout contributed to a more balanced feel, although it could be less confident in slippery conditions compared to all-wheel-drive competitors. The gear ratios were tuned for a balance of acceleration and fuel economy, with fifth gear providing a comfortable cruising speed on the highway. Compared to the automatic transmission version, the manual offered a more direct connection to the engine and a more engaging driving experience. However, the automatic was favored by buyers prioritizing convenience.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The Tracker II 2.5i V6 typically came with a reasonable level of standard equipment. This included air conditioning, power windows and locks, and an AM/FM stereo. Interior upholstery was typically cloth, with a relatively simple and functional dashboard layout. Optional extras included a sunroof, upgraded audio systems, and alloy wheels. The 2.5i V6 trim generally represented a step up in terms of features compared to the base four-cylinder models, but it wasn’t positioned as a luxury trim. It aimed to provide a good balance of value and features for buyers seeking a more capable and enjoyable driving experience.
Chassis & Braking
The Tracker II utilized a body-on-frame construction, a traditional SUV design that provided good durability and off-road capability. The front suspension consisted of a MacPherson strut setup, while the rear employed a multi-link coil spring arrangement. Braking duties were handled by ventilated discs at the front and drum brakes at the rear. Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were standard, enhancing safety and control during emergency braking situations. The chassis was tuned to provide a comfortable ride on paved roads, while still offering reasonable off-road performance. The rear-wheel-drive configuration and relatively short wheelbase contributed to a nimble feel, but also limited its overall stability compared to larger SUVs.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Chevrolet Tracker II 2.5i V6 was generally well-received by automotive critics as a competent and affordable small SUV. The V6 engine was praised for its smooth power delivery and improved performance compared to the base four-cylinder. However, some reviewers noted the dated interior and the somewhat basic features compared to newer competitors. Fuel economy was considered average for its class. Compared to the four-cylinder Tracker II models, the 2.5i V6 offered a significant performance upgrade, but at a higher price point. Compared to rivals like the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4, the Tracker II offered a more rugged and utilitarian appeal, but lacked the refinement and features of those Japanese competitors.
Legacy
The Chevrolet Tracker II 2.5i V6, while not a sales leader, has developed a following among enthusiasts who appreciate its simplicity, affordability, and relatively robust powertrain. The H25A V6 engine is known for its reliability, although regular maintenance is essential. Today, well-maintained examples are becoming increasingly sought after by collectors and off-road enthusiasts. The rear-wheel-drive configuration and body-on-frame construction make it a capable off-road vehicle, and its relatively simple mechanicals make it easier to maintain and repair compared to more modern SUVs. The Tracker II 2.5i V6 represents a unique and often overlooked chapter in Chevrolet’s SUV history.
