The Ford Ranger III Single Cab (facelift 2015) 2.2 TDCi 4×4 represents a significant iteration of Ford’s globally successful mid-size pickup truck. Produced from 2015 to 2018, this variant was primarily aimed at the utility and commercial vehicle markets, particularly in Europe, South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand. While not officially sold in the United States during this generation, the Ranger III was a crucial model for Ford in regions where compact and mid-size trucks remained highly popular. This specific 2.2 TDCi engine and four-wheel-drive configuration offered a balance between fuel efficiency, capability, and affordability, positioning it as a workhorse option within the Ranger lineup.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Generation | Ranger III Single Cab (facelift 2015) |
| Type (Engine) | 2.2 TDCi (160 Hp) 4×4 |
| Start of production | 2015 |
| End of production | 2018 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Pick-up |
| Seats | 2 |
| Doors | 2 |
| Fuel consumption (combined) | 6.9 l/100 km (34.1 US mpg, 40.9 UK mpg, 14.5 km/l) |
| CO2 emissions | 182 g/km |
| Fuel Type | Diesel |
| Emission standard | Euro 5 |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 12.1 kg/Hp, 82.8 Hp/tonne |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 5 kg/Nm, 199.2 Nm/tonne |
| Power | 160 Hp @ 3200 rpm |
| Power per litre | 72.8 Hp/l |
| Torque | 385 Nm @ 1600-2500 rpm (283.96 lb.-ft. @ 1600-2500 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Longitudinal |
| Engine displacement | 2198 cm3 (134.13 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 4 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 86 mm (3.39 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 94.6 mm (3.72 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 15.7:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Diesel Commonrail |
| Engine aspiration | Turbocharger, Intercooler |
| Engine oil capacity | 8.55 l (9.03 US qt | 7.52 UK qt) |
| Coolant | 11.5 l (12.15 US qt | 10.12 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 1933 kg (4261.54 lbs.) |
| Max. weight | 3200 kg (7054.79 lbs.) |
| Max load | 1267 kg (2793.26 lbs.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 80 l (21.13 US gal | 17.6 UK gal) |
| Length | 5277-5354 mm (207.76 – 210.79 in.) |
| Width | 1860 mm (73.23 in.) |
| Height | 1800-1806 mm (70.87 – 71.1 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 3220 mm (126.77 in.) |
| Front track | 1560 mm (61.42 in.) |
| Rear track | 1560 mm (61.42 in.) |
| Front overhang | 908 mm (35.75 in.) |
| Rear overhang | 1149 mm (45.24 in.) |
| Ride height (ground clearance) | 223-237 mm (8.78 – 9.33 in.) |
| Approach angle | 28° |
| Departure angle | 28° |
| Ramp-over angle | 25° |
| Climb angle | 32° |
| Wading depth | 800 mm (31.5 in.) |
| Drive wheel | All wheel drive (4×4) |
| Number of gears | 6 |
| Gearbox type | Manual transmission |
| Front suspension | Independent coil spring |
| Rear suspension | Dependent suspension of two longitudinal semi-elliptic leaf springs |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs |
| Rear brakes | Drum |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Power steering | Electric |
| Tires size | 215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18 |
| Wheel rims size | 16; 17; 18 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of this Ranger variant is the 2.2-liter TDCi (Turbo Diesel Commonrail Injection) engine. This engine, part of Ford’s Duratorq family, is an inline-four cylinder diesel known for its robustness and relatively good fuel economy. The 2.2 TDCi utilizes a common rail direct injection system, delivering fuel at extremely high pressure for optimized combustion. The engine features a single turbocharger with an intercooler, boosting power output to 160 horsepower at 3200 rpm and 385 Nm (284 lb-ft) of torque between 1600 and 2500 rpm. This torque curve is particularly well-suited for hauling and towing. The engine’s architecture includes a cast iron block and aluminum cylinder head, contributing to its durability. The 6-speed manual transmission was the standard offering for this configuration, providing a direct connection to the engine and allowing for driver control.
Driving Characteristics
The 2.2 TDCi 4×4 Ranger offered a practical and capable driving experience. While not a performance-oriented truck, the engine’s torque output provided ample power for everyday driving and hauling moderate loads. The 6-speed manual transmission allowed drivers to keep the engine in its optimal power band. Compared to higher-output versions of the Ranger (like those equipped with the 3.2-liter engine), this variant felt less eager to accelerate, but it compensated with improved fuel economy. The four-wheel-drive system, selectable via a rotary dial, provided enhanced traction in off-road conditions and slippery surfaces. The ride quality, typical of a body-on-frame pickup, was firm but acceptable, especially when unladen.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The Single Cab Ranger 2.2 TDCi 4×4 was typically offered in base or mid-level trim configurations. Standard equipment generally included air conditioning, power steering, a basic audio system, and steel wheels. Higher trims added features like alloy wheels, power windows, central locking, and upgraded interior trim. The interior was functional and durable, designed for work rather than luxury. Optional extras included a limited-slip differential, a tow bar, and various accessories for the cargo bed. The Single Cab configuration meant seating for only two occupants, making it ideal for commercial use or drivers who didn’t require passenger space.
Chassis & Braking
The Ranger III utilized a traditional body-on-frame construction, providing a robust and durable platform. The front suspension consisted of independent coil springs, while the rear suspension employed a leaf spring setup, optimized for load-carrying capacity. Braking duties were handled by ventilated discs at the front and drum brakes at the rear. ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) was standard, enhancing safety during emergency braking. The chassis was designed to withstand the rigors of off-road use and heavy loads. The relatively simple rear drum brake setup was a cost-saving measure common in base and mid-range trims.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Ford Ranger III 2.2 TDCi 4×4 was well-received in its target markets as a reliable and capable workhorse. Critics praised its fuel efficiency and durability, but some noted its relatively basic interior and lack of refinement compared to more modern pickups. Compared to the 3.2-liter Ranger, the 2.2 TDCi offered better fuel economy but less outright power. Against competitors like the Toyota Hilux and Nissan Navara, the Ranger offered a competitive combination of features, performance, and price. The 2.2 TDCi was often favored by businesses and individuals who prioritized practicality and running costs over outright performance.
Legacy
The Ford Ranger III 2.2 TDCi 4×4 has proven to be a durable and reliable vehicle in the used car market. The Duratorq engine is known for its longevity, provided it has been properly maintained. Common issues include wear and tear on suspension components and potential problems with the fuel injection system if not serviced regularly. Today, these Rangers represent a cost-effective option for those seeking a capable and dependable pickup truck. The simplicity of the 2.2 TDCi engine makes it relatively easy and affordable to repair, contributing to its continued popularity among those who need a practical and robust vehicle.
