The Ford Ranger III Super Cab, specifically the facelifted version produced from 2015 to 2018, represented a significant evolution of Ford’s mid-size pickup truck for the global market. While not initially sold in the United States during this generation, it was a popular choice in Europe, Australia, South Africa, and parts of Asia. The 3.2 TDCi variant, equipped with a six-speed automatic transmission, occupied a mid-to-upper position in the Ranger lineup, offering a balance of power, capability, and relative refinement. This model aimed to appeal to buyers needing a robust workhorse with the convenience of an automatic gearbox.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Ford |
| Model | Ranger |
| Generation | Ranger III Super Cab (facelift 2015) |
| Type (Engine) | 3.2 TDCi (200 Hp) Automatic |
| Start of production | 2015 |
| End of production | 2018 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Pick-up |
| Seats | 5 |
| Doors | 2 |
| Fuel consumption (combined) | 8.5 l/100 km (27.7 US mpg, 33.2 UK mpg, 11.8 km/l) |
| CO2 emissions | 225 g/km |
| Fuel Type | Diesel |
| Maximum speed | 175 km/h (108.74 mph) |
| Emission standard | Euro 5 |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 9.8 kg/Hp, 102.4 Hp/tonne |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 4.2 kg/Nm, 240.5 Nm/tonne |
| Power | 200 Hp @ 3000 rpm |
| Power per litre | 62.5 Hp/l |
| Torque | 470 Nm @ 1500-2750 rpm (346.65 lb.-ft. @ 1500-2750 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Longitudinal |
| Engine displacement | 3198 cm3 (195.15 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 5 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 89.9 mm (3.54 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 100.8 mm (3.97 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 15.7:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Diesel Commonrail |
| Engine aspiration | Turbocharger, Intercooler |
| Engine oil capacity | 9.75 l (10.3 US qt | 8.58 UK qt) |
| Coolant | 13.5 l (14.27 US qt | 11.88 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 1954 kg (4307.83 lbs.) |
| Max. weight | 3200 kg (7054.79 lbs.) |
| Max load | 1246 kg (2746.96 lbs.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 80 l (21.13 US gal | 17.6 UK gal) |
| Length | 5277-5354 mm (207.76 – 210.79 in.) |
| Width | 1860 mm (73.23 in.) |
| Height | 1804 mm (71.02 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 3220 mm (126.77 in.) |
| Front track | 1590 mm (62.6 in.) |
| Rear track | 1590 mm (62.6 in.) |
| Front overhang | 908 mm (35.75 in.) |
| Rear overhang | 1149 mm (45.24 in.) |
| Ride height (ground clearance) | 135 mm (5.31 in.) |
| Approach angle | 28° |
| Departure angle | 28° |
| Ramp-over angle | 25° |
| Climb angle | 32° |
| Wading depth | 600 mm (23.62 in.) |
| Drivetrain Architecture | Rear wheel drive |
| Number of gears | 6 |
| Gearbox type | Automatic transmission |
| Front suspension | Independent coil spring |
| Rear suspension | Dependent suspension of two longitudinal semi-elliptic leaf springs |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs |
| Rear brakes | Drum |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Power steering | Electric |
| Tires size | 215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18 |
| Wheel rims size | 16; 17; 18 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of the Ranger 3.2 TDCi is the Puma 3.2-liter inline five-cylinder diesel engine. This engine, part of the Puma family developed by Ford, was known for its robust construction and relatively smooth operation for a diesel. The ‘TDCi’ designation stands for Turbo Diesel Common Injection, indicating the use of a common rail direct fuel injection system. This system, supplied by Bosch, allowed for precise control of fuel delivery, optimizing combustion efficiency and reducing emissions. The engine featured a single variable geometry turbocharger (VGT) and an intercooler to enhance power and torque. The engine produced 200 horsepower at 3000 rpm and a substantial 470 Nm (346.65 lb-ft) of torque between 1500 and 2750 rpm. The six-speed automatic transmission, sourced from ZF, was chosen for its durability and smooth shifting characteristics. It was designed to handle the engine’s torque output effectively, providing a comfortable driving experience.
Driving Characteristics
The 3.2 TDCi automatic Ranger offered a noticeable step up in performance compared to the lower-powered 2.2-liter diesel options. While not a sports truck, the engine provided ample power for everyday driving and hauling loads. The automatic transmission, while smooth, wasn’t particularly quick to shift, prioritizing comfort over outright performance. The gear ratios were tuned for towing and off-road capability, meaning acceleration wasn’t as brisk as some competitors. Compared to the six-speed manual version of the same engine, the automatic offered greater convenience, especially in urban environments and challenging terrain. However, the manual transmission generally provided slightly better fuel economy and a more engaging driving experience. The Ranger’s suspension, tuned for both on-road comfort and off-road capability, provided a reasonably compliant ride, even when unladen.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The 3.2 TDCi automatic typically came in higher trim levels, such as Limited or Wildtrack, depending on the specific market. Standard equipment often included air conditioning, power windows and locks, a basic audio system with USB connectivity, and alloy wheels. Higher trims added features like leather upholstery, heated front seats, a more advanced infotainment system with navigation, and parking sensors. Optional extras included a tow bar, a bed liner, and various off-road accessories. The interior design was functional and durable, with a focus on practicality rather than luxury.
Chassis & Braking
The Ranger III Super Cab utilized a body-on-frame construction, providing a robust and durable platform for demanding applications. The front suspension consisted of independent coil springs, while the rear suspension employed a traditional leaf spring setup. This configuration offered a good balance of ride comfort and load-carrying capacity. Braking duties were handled by ventilated discs at the front and drum brakes at the rear. Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) was standard. The steering system was a rack-and-pinion setup with electric power assistance, providing a reasonably light and precise steering feel.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi automatic was generally well-received by automotive critics. It was praised for its powerful engine, comfortable ride, and robust build quality. However, some reviewers noted the automatic transmission’s slightly sluggish performance and the relatively high fuel consumption compared to the manual version. Compared to competitors like the Toyota Hilux and Mitsubishi Triton, the Ranger offered a more refined interior and a more powerful engine, but it often came at a higher price point. Fuel economy was competitive within its class, averaging around 8.5 liters per 100 kilometers (27.7 US mpg).
Legacy
The 3.2 TDCi engine proved to be a reliable and durable powerplant, with many examples still in service today. While not without its quirks – some owners have reported issues with the fuel injection system and turbocharger – the engine is generally considered to be well-engineered and capable of handling high mileage. The Ranger III Super Cab, particularly the facelifted models, have become popular choices in the used car market, offering a compelling combination of capability, comfort, and value. Its robust construction and readily available parts supply ensure that it will remain a viable option for buyers seeking a dependable mid-size pickup truck for years to come.
