The Mazda 3 II Hatchback, specifically the 2.5-liter (167 hp) variant with an automatic transmission, was produced between 2009 and 2011 as part of the BL generation. This model represented a significant step forward for Mazda, building upon the success of the first-generation 3 with a more refined design, improved interior, and enhanced driving dynamics. Within the BL range, the 2.5L automatic served as a mid-range offering, positioned above the 2.0-liter models and below the more performance-oriented MazdaSpeed3. It aimed to provide a balance of power, comfort, and fuel efficiency for the North American market, where larger engines were generally preferred.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Mazda |
| Model | 3 |
| Generation | II Hatchback (BL) |
| Type (Engine) | 2.5 (167 Hp) Automatic |
| Start of production | 2009 |
| End of production | 2011 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Hatchback |
| Seats | 5 |
| Doors | 5 |
| Fuel consumption (urban) | 9.2 l/100 km (25.6 US mpg) |
| Fuel consumption (extra urban) | 6.8 l/100 km (34.6 US mpg) |
| Fuel Type | Petrol (Gasoline) |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 8.4 kg/Hp |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 6.1 kg/Nm |
| Power | 167 Hp @ 6000 rpm |
| Power per litre | 67.1 Hp/l |
| Torque | 228 Nm @ 4000 rpm (168.16 lb.-ft. @ 4000 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Transverse |
| Engine Model/Code | L5-VE |
| Engine displacement | 2489 cm3 (151.89 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 4 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 89 mm (3.5 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 100 mm (3.94 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 9.7:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Multi-port manifold injection |
| Engine aspiration | Naturally aspirated engine |
| Valvetrain | DOHC, VVT |
| Engine oil capacity | 5 l (5.28 US qt | 4.4 UK qt) |
| Coolant capacity | 7.5 l (7.93 US qt | 6.6 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 1399 kg (3084.27 lbs.) |
| Trunk (boot) space – minimum | 481 l (16.99 cu. ft.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 60 l (15.85 US gal | 13.2 UK gal) |
| Length | 4500 mm (177.17 in.) |
| Width | 1755 mm (69.09 in.) |
| Height | 1470 mm (57.87 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 2640 mm (103.94 in.) |
| Front track | 1530-1535 mm (60.24 – 60.43 in.) |
| Rear track | 1515-1520 mm (59.65 – 59.84 in.) |
| Ride height (ground clearance) | 155 mm (6.1 in.) |
| Minimum turning circle | 10.4 m (34.12 ft.) |
| Drivetrain Architecture | Front wheel drive |
| Number of gears | 5 |
| Gearbox type | Automatic transmission |
| Front suspension | Coil spring, Independent type McPherson, Transverse stabilizer |
| Rear suspension | Independent multi-link suspension, Transverse stabilizer, Coil spring |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs |
| Rear brakes | Disc |
| Assisting systems | ABS (Anti-lock braking system) |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Power steering | Electric Steering |
| Tires size | 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17 |
| Wheel rims size | 6.5J x 16; 7J x 17 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of this Mazda 3 variant is the L5-VE 2.5-liter inline-four engine. This engine is a naturally aspirated powerplant featuring multi-port fuel injection and a double overhead camshaft (DOHC) valvetrain with variable valve timing (VVT). The L5-VE was designed to offer a balance of performance and efficiency, and it represented a significant upgrade over the smaller 2.0-liter engines available in other trims. The engine’s architecture prioritized smooth operation and linear power delivery. The five-speed automatic transmission was a conventional torque-converter type, chosen for its smoothness and ease of use. While not as sporty as a manual transmission, it provided comfortable shifting for everyday driving. The transmission was tuned to prioritize fuel economy and smooth acceleration, rather than aggressive downshifts.
Driving Characteristics
The 2.5-liter engine paired with the five-speed automatic delivered a respectable driving experience. Acceleration was adequate for most situations, with the engine providing sufficient power for highway merging and passing maneuvers. However, it wasn’t a particularly quick car; the automatic transmission, while smooth, did sap some of the engine’s potential. Compared to the manual transmission versions of the 2.5L, the automatic felt slightly less responsive. The gear ratios were optimized for fuel efficiency, meaning the engine didn’t always feel like it was in its sweet spot. The suspension provided a comfortable ride, absorbing bumps and imperfections in the road well. Steering was precise and well-weighted, offering a good level of feedback to the driver.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The 2.5-liter automatic Mazda 3 typically came with a fairly comprehensive list of standard features. These included air conditioning, power windows and locks, a CD player with auxiliary input, and keyless entry. Higher trim levels, such as the Grand Touring, added features like a sunroof, leather upholstery, heated front seats, and a premium sound system. Optional extras included a navigation system and a rear spoiler. Interior upholstery was typically cloth, although leather was available on higher trims. The dashboard layout was functional and well-designed, with easy-to-read gauges and intuitive controls.
Chassis & Braking
The BL generation Mazda 3 utilized a MacPherson strut front suspension and a multi-link rear suspension. This setup provided a good balance of ride comfort and handling. The front suspension featured a transverse stabilizer bar to reduce body roll during cornering. The rear suspension also included a stabilizer bar. Braking duties were handled by ventilated discs at the front and solid discs at the rear. Anti-lock brakes (ABS) were standard. The chassis was designed to be rigid and lightweight, contributing to the car’s overall handling characteristics.
Market Reception & Comparison
The 2.5-liter automatic Mazda 3 was generally well-received by automotive critics. It was praised for its comfortable ride, refined interior, and decent fuel economy. However, some critics noted that the automatic transmission could feel sluggish at times, and that the engine lacked the outright performance of some of its competitors. Compared to the 2.0-liter models, the 2.5L offered a noticeable improvement in power and acceleration. Compared to the MazdaSpeed3, it was less focused on performance but offered a more comfortable and practical driving experience. Fuel economy was comparable to other vehicles in its class, averaging around 25 mpg in combined driving.
Legacy
The L5-VE engine and the five-speed automatic transmission used in the 2009-2011 Mazda 3 are generally considered to be reliable. While not immune to age-related issues, these components are known to withstand considerable mileage with proper maintenance. Common issues include oil leaks and occasional transmission slippage, but these are typically not major concerns. Today, these Mazda 3s can be found on the used car market at affordable prices, making them a good value for buyers looking for a reliable and practical hatchback. The BL generation Mazda 3 is remembered as a well-rounded and enjoyable car that helped solidify Mazda’s reputation for building sporty and reliable vehicles.
