The Mazda BT-50 Dual Cab II XTR 3.2, produced from 2011 to 2014, represents Mazda’s entry into the highly competitive mid-size pickup truck market. This generation, built in collaboration with Ford (sharing a platform with the Ford Ranger T6), aimed to provide a robust and capable workhorse with a degree of refinement not always found in the segment. The XTR 3.2 4×4 Automatic variant occupied a mid-to-upper position within the BT-50 lineup, offering a balance of power, features, and convenience for both commercial and recreational users. It was primarily sold in markets outside of North America, including Australia, New Zealand, Europe, and parts of Asia and Latin America.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | Mazda |
| Model | BT-50 |
| Generation | BT-50 Dual Cab II |
| Type | XTR 3.2 (200 Hp) 4×4 Automatic |
| Start of production | 2011 |
| End of production | 2014 |
| Powertrain Architecture | Internal Combustion engine |
| Body type | Pick-up |
| Seats | 5 |
| Doors | 4 |
| Fuel consumption (combined) | 9.2 l/100 km (25.6 US mpg, 30.7 UK mpg, 10.9 km/l) |
| Fuel Type | Diesel |
| Emission standard | Euro 4 |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 10.5 kg/Hp, 95.1 Hp/tonne |
| Weight-to-torque ratio | 4.5 kg/Nm, 223.5 Nm/tonne |
| Power | 200 Hp @ 3000 rpm |
| Power per litre | 62.5 Hp/l |
| Torque | 470 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm (346.65 lb.-ft. @ 1750-2500 rpm) |
| Engine layout | Front, Longitudinal |
| Engine displacement | 3198 cm3 (195.15 cu. in.) |
| Number of cylinders | 5 |
| Engine configuration | Inline |
| Cylinder Bore | 89.9 mm (3.54 in.) |
| Piston Stroke | 100.7 mm (3.96 in.) |
| Compression ratio | 15.5:1 |
| Number of valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Fuel injection system | Diesel Commonrail |
| Engine aspiration | Turbocharger, Intercooler |
| Valvetrain | DOHC |
| Engine oil capacity | 9.75 l (10.3 US qt | 8.58 UK qt) |
| Coolant capacity | 13.3 l (14.05 US qt | 11.7 UK qt) |
| Kerb Weight | 2103 kg (4636.32 lbs.) |
| Max. weight | 3200 kg (7054.79 lbs.) |
| Max load | 1097 kg (2418.47 lbs.) |
| Fuel tank capacity | 80 l (21.13 US gal | 17.6 UK gal) |
| Permitted trailer load (braked) | 3500 kg (7716.18 lbs.) |
| Permitted trailer load (unbraked) | 750 kg (1653.47 lbs.) |
| Permitted towbar download | 350 kg (771.62 lbs.) |
| Length | 5365 mm (211.22 in.) |
| Width | 1850 mm (72.83 in.) |
| Height | 1821 mm (71.69 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 3220 mm (126.77 in.) |
| Front track | 1560 mm (61.42 in.) |
| Rear track | 1560 mm (61.42 in.) |
| Front overhang | 919 mm (36.18 in.) |
| Rear overhang | 1226 mm (48.27 in.) |
| Ride height (ground clearance) | 205 mm (8.07 in.) |
| Minimum turning circle | 12.4 m (40.68 ft.) |
| Approach angle | 28.2° |
| Departure angle | 26.4° |
| Ramp-over angle | 25.0° |
| Wading depth | 800 mm (31.5 in.) |
| Drivetrain | All wheel drive (4×4) |
| Gears | 6, automatic transmission |
| Front suspension | Double wishbone |
| Rear suspension | Leaf spring |
| Front brakes | Ventilated discs, 302 mm |
| Rear brakes | Drum, 295 mm |
| Steering type | Steering rack and pinion |
| Power steering | Hydraulic |
| Tires size | 265/65 R17 112T |
| Wheel rims size | 8.0J x 17 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The heart of the BT-50 XTR 3.2 is the 3.2-liter Duratorq inline-five cylinder diesel engine. This engine, developed by Ford but adapted for Mazda’s application, is characterized by its robust construction and strong low-end torque. The engine utilizes a common rail direct injection system, delivering fuel at extremely high pressures for optimized combustion. A variable geometry turbocharger with an intercooler further enhances performance, providing 200 horsepower at 3000 rpm and a substantial 470 Nm (346.65 lb-ft) of torque between 1750 and 2500 rpm. The engine features a double overhead camshaft (DOHC) valvetrain with four valves per cylinder, contributing to its efficient operation. The automatic transmission is a six-speed unit, providing smooth shifts and allowing the engine to operate within its optimal torque band.
Driving Characteristics
The BT-50 XTR 3.2 Automatic delivers a driving experience geared towards practicality and capability. While not a performance-oriented pickup, the 3.2-liter engine provides ample power for hauling and towing. The automatic transmission, while smooth, can feel slightly less responsive than a manual gearbox, particularly during quick acceleration. The gear ratios are tuned for maximizing torque and fuel efficiency, rather than outright speed. Compared to the 2.5-liter engine options available in the BT-50 range, the 3.2 offered a significant performance upgrade, making it better suited for demanding tasks and heavier loads. It also provided a more relaxed driving experience on the highway, with less need for frequent downshifts.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The XTR trim level positioned the BT-50 as a well-equipped offering. Standard features typically included air conditioning, power windows and locks, a basic audio system with CD player, and alloy wheels. The interior featured durable cloth upholstery and a functional dashboard layout. Optional extras could include a navigation system, upgraded audio with Bluetooth connectivity, and a reversing camera. The Dual Cab configuration provided seating for five passengers, with a spacious rear cabin suitable for families or work crews.
Chassis & Braking
The BT-50 Dual Cab II utilizes a body-on-frame construction, providing a robust and durable platform. The front suspension consists of a double wishbone setup, while the rear employs leaf springs. This configuration prioritizes load-carrying capacity and off-road capability. The XTR 3.2 typically featured ventilated disc brakes at the front and drum brakes at the rear. Anti-lock Braking System (ABS) was standard, enhancing safety during emergency braking situations. The hydraulic power steering provides a reasonable level of assistance, making the truck relatively easy to maneuver despite its size.
Market Reception & Comparison
The Mazda BT-50, and specifically the XTR 3.2 Automatic, was generally well-received by automotive critics. It was praised for its strong engine, comfortable ride, and practical features. However, some reviewers noted that the automatic transmission could feel sluggish at times, and the interior design was somewhat utilitarian compared to some competitors. In terms of fuel economy, the BT-50 3.2 Automatic offered respectable figures for a vehicle of its size and capability, averaging around 9.2 l/100 km (25.6 US mpg). Compared to the smaller-engined BT-50 variants, the 3.2 offered superior performance but at the cost of slightly increased fuel consumption.
Legacy
The BT-50 Dual Cab II XTR 3.2 has proven to be a relatively reliable workhorse in the used car market. The Duratorq engine is known for its durability, provided it is properly maintained. Common issues include wear and tear on suspension components and potential problems with the fuel injection system if not serviced regularly. Today, these vehicles represent a cost-effective option for those seeking a capable and practical pickup truck. Their robust construction and readily available parts make them relatively easy to maintain and repair, ensuring their continued presence on roads and work sites for years to come.
