The MINEmobility City EV Concept, specifically the 20 kWh (68 hp) variant, represents a notable, though relatively short-lived, entry into the early micro-electric vehicle (EV) market. Introduced in 2018, this three-door hatchback aimed to provide an affordable and practical urban transportation solution. The City EV Concept was designed and manufactured by MINEmobility, a company focused on developing compact electric vehicles for city environments. It was positioned as a basic, no-frills EV intended for short commutes and city errands, prioritizing efficiency and maneuverability over outright performance. The vehicle’s design and specifications reflect the growing demand for sustainable transportation options during a period of increasing environmental awareness and tightening emissions regulations.
Technical Specifications
| Brand | MINEmobility |
| Model | City EV |
| Generation | City EV Concept |
| Type (Engine) | 20 kWh (68 Hp) |
| Start of production | 2018 |
| Powertrain Architecture | BEV (Electric Vehicle) |
| Body type | Hatchback |
| Seats | 2 |
| Doors | 3 |
| Fuel Type | Electricity |
| Acceleration 0 – 100 km/h | 12 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 62 mph | 12 sec |
| Acceleration 0 – 60 mph | 11.4 sec |
| Maximum speed | 120 km/h (74.56 mph) |
| Weight-to-power ratio | 13.2 kg/Hp, 75.6 Hp/tonne |
| Gross battery capacity | 20 kWh |
| All-electric range | 200 km (124.27 mi) |
| Electric motor power | 68 Hp |
| Electric motor Torque | 160 Nm (118.01 lb.-ft.) |
| System power | 68 Hp |
| Kerb Weight | 900 kg (1984.16 lbs.) |
| Length | 3250 mm (127.95 in.) |
| Width | 1750 mm (68.9 in.) |
| Height | 1600 mm (62.99 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 2010 mm (79.13 in.) |
| Drive wheel | Front wheel drive |
| Front suspension | Independent type McPherson |
| Rear suspension | Independent multi-link suspension |
| Tires size | 225/40 ZR18 |
| Wheel rims size | 18 |
Powertrain & Engine Architecture
The MINEmobility City EV Concept is powered by a single electric motor producing 68 horsepower and 160 Nm (118 lb-ft) of torque. The vehicle utilizes a 20 kWh battery pack, providing an all-electric range of approximately 200 kilometers (124 miles) under ideal conditions. Details regarding the battery chemistry are limited, but it is presumed to be a lithium-ion based system, common for EVs of this era. The powertrain is a direct-drive system, meaning there is no traditional multi-speed transmission. Power is delivered directly from the motor to the front wheels. The vehicle employs a standard charging port compatible with Level 1 and Level 2 AC charging, though DC fast charging capabilities were not a standard feature. The electric motor itself is a relatively simple, permanent magnet synchronous motor, chosen for its efficiency and cost-effectiveness. This motor type is known for its reliability and relatively low maintenance requirements, making it a suitable choice for a budget-focused EV.
Driving Characteristics
The 68 hp output and direct-drive configuration result in modest, but adequate, performance for urban driving. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h (0-62 mph) takes approximately 12 seconds. The vehicle’s primary strength lies in its instant torque delivery, providing brisk acceleration at lower speeds, making it well-suited for navigating city traffic. The lack of gears means a consistent power delivery throughout the speed range, but also limits top-end performance. The relatively lightweight construction (900 kg / 1984 lbs) helps to offset the limited horsepower. Handling is generally considered neutral, with the McPherson strut front suspension and multi-link rear suspension providing a comfortable ride. However, the vehicle is not designed for spirited driving or high-speed cornering. The direct-drive system, while simplifying the powertrain, does result in a slightly less refined driving experience compared to EVs with multi-speed transmissions, particularly at highway speeds.
Equipment & Trim Levels
The City EV Concept was offered with a fairly basic level of equipment, reflecting its positioning as an affordable EV. Standard features included power windows, central locking, and a basic audio system. The interior was minimalist, with durable plastic trim and cloth upholstery. Air conditioning was often an optional extra. Safety features were also limited, typically including only basic airbags and anti-lock brakes. Given the concept nature and limited production run, there weren’t extensive trim levels available. Customization options were minimal, primarily revolving around exterior color choices. The focus was clearly on providing a functional and affordable transportation solution, rather than luxury or extensive features.
Chassis & Braking
The City EV Concept utilizes a front-wheel-drive layout with an independent McPherson strut suspension at the front and an independent multi-link suspension at the rear. This suspension setup aims to provide a balance between ride comfort and handling. Braking duties are handled by disc brakes at the front and drum brakes at the rear, a cost-saving measure common in vehicles of this price point. The vehicle rides on 18-inch alloy wheels with 225/40 ZR18 tires. The steering system is a standard electric power steering (EPS) setup, providing light and easy steering feel for urban maneuverability. The use of drum brakes on the rear was a deliberate decision to reduce production costs, although it does slightly compromise braking performance compared to a full disc brake setup.
Market Reception & Comparison
The MINEmobility City EV Concept received limited media coverage and experienced modest sales. Critics generally praised its affordability and practicality as a city car, but noted its limited range, basic features, and lack of brand recognition. Compared to other EVs available at the time, such as the Renault Zoe or Nissan Leaf, the City EV Concept offered a lower price point but also significantly less range and fewer features. Its primary competitors were other micro-EVs and small gasoline-powered city cars. Fuel economy, being an EV, was a significant advantage, offering substantially lower running costs compared to internal combustion engine vehicles. The vehicle struggled to gain traction in a market increasingly dominated by established automakers with larger marketing budgets and more extensive dealer networks.
Legacy
The MINEmobility City EV Concept, while not a commercial success, represents an early attempt to bring affordable electric mobility to the masses. The company faced financial difficulties and ultimately ceased operations shortly after the vehicle’s introduction. As a result, the City EV Concept is now a relatively rare vehicle. Long-term reliability data is limited due to the small production run, but the simple electric powertrain is generally considered to be reliable. The vehicle’s legacy lies in its contribution to the growing awareness of electric vehicles and its demonstration of the potential for compact, affordable EVs in urban environments. Today, examples of the City EV Concept are sought after by collectors interested in early EV history. It serves as a reminder of the challenges faced by early EV startups and the importance of financial stability and brand recognition in a competitive automotive market.
